Close button
Phone hours:
Monday - Friday
9 AM - 5:30 PM (Eastern Time)
Call US Now
Send Message
Close button
Phone hours:
Monday - Friday
9 AM - 5:30 PM (Eastern Time)
Call US Now
Send Message

Melville Johnson Blog

Search Results

No matching results.

Recent Updates

Medical Documentation for Reasonable Accommodations

Arrow
When it comes to requests for reasonable accommodations, employers may ask individual employees for “reasonable documentation” when the disability or need for accommodation is not obvious. The employer is entitled to know that the individual has a covered disability.
Melville Johnson
April 7, 2020
Continue To Blog Post
Arrow

Poor Judgement Charge

Arrow
Have you been subjected to discipline or removed by your federal employer for poor judgment? Just as the charge sounds, this allegation is referring to the inability to make appropriate decisions in light of your federal position or responsibilities.
Melville Johnson
April 7, 2020
Continue To Blog Post
Arrow

Reassignment as a Reasonable Accommodation

Arrow
The ADA lists “reassignment to a vacant position” as a form of reasonable accommodation available to qualified individuals with disabilities. 42 U.S.C. § 12111(9)(B). Reassignment must be provided to employees who can no longer perform the essential functions of their current position, with or without accommodation because of their disability
Melville Johnson
April 7, 2020
Continue To Blog Post
Arrow

Representation During "Performance Improvement Plan" Process

Arrow
Performance Improvement Plans (“PIP”) can be one of the most stressful situations for a federal employee employed at a Federal Agency. Sometimes the terms and conditions can be difficult to understand. Therefore, it is very important to retain legal advice to be sure you are aware of all stipulations of this process.
Melville
April 6, 2020
Continue To Blog Post
Arrow

The MSPB Appeals Process

Arrow
Most cases brought to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) are appeals of agency adverse actions--removals, suspensions of more than fourteen (14) days, reductions in grade or pay, and furloughs of thirty (30) days or less. Other cases include appeals of Office of Personnel Management (OPM) determinations in retirement matters, performance-based removals or reductions in grade, denials of within-grade salary increases, reduction-in-force actions.
Melville Johnson
April 6, 2020
Continue To Blog Post
Arrow

The Agency's Burden of Proof

Arrow
When a federal employee brings an appeal regarding a personnel action made by the federal agency in which they are employed, an Administrative Judge is assigned to the case and reviews the case based on information provided to him or her to make a decision. When a charge involves misconduct, the standard is “preponderance of the evidence. However, for performance cases, the standard is lowered to “substantial evidence.”
Melville Johnson
April 6, 2020
Continue To Blog Post
Arrow

Disability Retirement Process

Arrow
Disability Retirement is an employee benefit intended for those federal employees who are unable to complete a normal career due to disease or injury. These federal employees must then meet the statutory, regulatory, and administrative criteria to be eligible. The process is handled by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).
Melville Johnson
April 6, 2020
Continue To Blog Post
Arrow

Reviewing Arbitration Decisions

Arrow
Although more arbitration cases go to the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) for review, a federal employee may seek review from the MSPB when jurisdiction is found. The MSPB must have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the grievance.
Melville Johnson
April 6, 2020
Continue To Blog Post
Arrow

Harmful Error at the MSPB

Arrow
Employee rights are just as important within the Merit System Protection Board (MSPB), as they are in any other area of adjudication. Harmful error is said to have occurred whenever it is shown that the rights of the federal employee have been significantly impaired. When a federal employee is able to show that the application of the agency’s procedures was not in accordance with statute, rule or regulation, the MSPB may order a reversal.
Melville Johnson
April 2, 2020
Continue To Blog Post
Arrow

Successful Defenses Against Poor Work Performance

Arrow
For a poor work performance charge to be sustained by the MSPB, the Federal Agency mush show that the federal employee: 1) was notified that he/she was expected to perform a particular duty; 2) the employee’s performance was unacceptable in that duty; and 3) the agency’s measurement of the employee’s unacceptable work performance was accurate and reasonable.
Melville Johnson
April 2, 2020
Continue To Blog Post
Arrow

Inability to Perform (as a result of a medical condition)

Arrow
There are several variables that come into play in determining whether a federal agency has shown by preponderant evidence a federal employee’s Inability to Perform (as a result of a medical condition).
Melville Johnson
April 2, 2020
Continue To Blog Post
Arrow

Mitigating Penalties for Federal Employees

Arrow
Penalties issued by federal agencies can not only be detrimental to a federal employee’s current employment situation, but can also adversely affect their future employment opportunities. More often than not, instances of alleged misconduct issued by a federal agency will also be recorded in the employee’s personnel file.
Melville Johnson
April 2, 2020
Continue To Blog Post
Arrow
Contact us today
If you're a federal employee and feel you've been the victim of unlawful discrimination involving MSPB claims or EEO claims, our experienced federal employment attorneys stand ready to fight on your behalf. Give us a call today at (404) 724-0000 or fill out the form below and we'll be sure to follow up in a timely manner.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
what our clients are saying
“I really appreciate how much Melville Johnson cared about my case. From the very beginning of the process, their federal employee attorneys were friendly and very informative. We won the case, and they were even helpful afterwards, answering any questions or concerns. Thank you Melville Johnson, and I will definitely pass your good work along to others in need.”
- Jim R.
“Despite the complexity of my situation, Melville Johnson took on my claim and immediately put me at ease with a clear demonstration of their expertise with EEO law. From the very start, the firm’s team members have been amazing to work with—hardworking, honest and extremely trustworthy. I would recommend them to anyone who needed this type of legal assistance!”
- Bridget B.
“As a person with a disability working for the federal government, I knew I needed to get the right legal professional assistance for my case. And while the process could have been tedious and overwhelming for a layperson without much legal knowledge, Melville Johnson alleviated all the potential stress involved by taking the guesswork out of my hands. With their help, I received disability approval in record time! I want to thank you for the superior work your firm performed. From my very first contact, your Client Intake Manager took the time to answer all of my initial questions and provide detailed information at every turn. And your attorneys showed nothing but professionalism and kindness throughout the process.”
- Sandra B.
“The consummate professionals at Melville Johnson work closely with you to ensure your rights are being protected. As a current federal employee, I found myself in a situation where the job I was asked to do didn’t match the position description for which I was hired nor the compensation I deserved. With the firm’s help, I was able to obtain back pay and transfer into a position that matched the job I was performing."
- L.M.